Tuesday, May 25, 2010

TIC vs trade ballance


From top to bottom:
short - long term treasury spread
Treasury rates
Trade deficit of the US,blue % and yellow nominal
TIC+trade deficit yearly sum
TIC-trade deficit cummulative sum.


Top : TIC ballance,yearly,bottom TIC+trade ballance,yearly.


Definition of the line 29:

Number 3: What is included in the flows reported in line 29 (monthly change in banks' own net dollar-denominated liabilities)?

A. These flows include changes in banks' own liabilities to foreigners in the form of deposits from foreign residents into U.S. banking institutions and borrowings from foreign residents (including funds borrowed under repurchase agreements), and changes in banks' own claims on foreign residents in the form of deposits in foreign banks and loans to foreigners (including funds loaned under resale agreements). Because interbank positions-which can include both claims on and liabilities to the same foreign entity-are a large part of the banks' own cross-border positions, these data are reported as the change in banks' own liabilities to foreign residents net of the change in claims on foreign residents. This series can be volatile on a monthly frequency. Note that while these data are referred to as changes in "bank" positions, the data also include the changes in own cross-border claims and liabilities of other depository institutions such as savings and loans associations and credit unions, and of bank and financial holding companies and securities brokers and dealers.

http://www.ustreas.gov/tic/ticpr-faqs-2006nov16.html

date

Sum net TIC line 30

trade deficit

trade-TIC

cumm trade-TIC

Cumm trade

Cumm TIC

1991

5341

-31135

-25794

-25794

-31135

5341

1992

94137

-39212

54925

29131

-70347

99478

1993

94722

-70311

24411

53542

-140658

194200

1994

176716

-98493

78223

131765

-239151

370916

1995

171166

-96384

74782

206547

-335535

542082

1996

254175

-104065

150110

356657

-439600

796257

1997

311501

-108273

203228

559885

-547873

1107758

1998

304774

-166140

138634

698519

-714013

1412532

1999

362921

-265090

97831

796350

-979103

1775453

2000

372007

-379835

-7828

788522

-1358938

2147460

2001

431351

-365126

66225

854747

-1724064

2578811

2002

757012

-423725

333287

1188034

-2147789

3335823

2003

717556

-496915

220641

1408675

-2644704

4053379

2004

978860

-607730

371130

1779805

-3252434

5032239

2005

664973

-711567

-46594

1733211

-3964001

5697212

2006

1061837

-753283

308554

2041765

-4717284

6759049

2007

612166

-700258

-88092

1953673

-5417542

7371215

2008

664056

-695937

-31881

1921792

-6113479

8035271

2009

-283613

-378629

-662242

1259550

-6492108

7751658

So,in november 2008 the US banks get more dollar denominated deposits from the foreigners than the ammount of the new loans issued to the not-US residents .

Which is interestign,the shape of the curve.It is a logaritmic curve,and we are on the top of it.

If we check the yearly cummulative numbers,then we can see a hugh drop in 2009.(jan-jan sum number)

If we assume that the fall in the net flow of funds will remain on the current (up to the feb of 2010) level,and the trade deficit of the US remain the same, then the money will run out within two years for the US to finance the trade deficit .

The possible outcome will be a swing from a 600 billion deficit to a 300 billion surpluss (roughtly the half of the Chinese economy)

Logic:the TIC (Cross-Border Portfolio Financial Flows) have to be ballanced by the trade deficit.

If we summarise the diference between them in the past few years (cumm trade-TIC) then we get the cummulatice diference between the money which was used to buy stuff and the borrowed money.

US summ data explained:

top:net spread between the short and the long term treasury rate

second:long and short term treasury rates

third:trade deficit , yellow nominal,blue % yoy

fourth: trade-TIC

bottom:cummolative trade-TIC

keyworlds:

TIC monthly reports on Cross-Border Portfolio Financial Flows

US goods and services balance of payments (BOP)


BOTTOM LINE:


With hte current trends,we can go only for two more years.



0 comments: